Center for Sustainable Immigration

Evidence-based research on immigration policy that preserves national identity and cultural cohesion

47M
Foreign-Born Residents (2024)

14.3% of total population - approaching the 1890 peak of 14.8% during the first great wave1

1.2M
Legal Immigrants Arriving in 2023

Lawful permanent residents admitted, with another ~3M entering illegally2

-81%
Reduction in Immigration following 1917 & 1924 Acts

Immigration cut from 1.3M (1907) to ~250K annually (1950s avg) through literacy tests and national origin quotas—stayed low for 40+ years3

+60%
Increase in Home Price-to-Income Ratio Since 1990

From 3.5x income in 1985 to 5.6x in 2024—homes now cost 60% more relative to wages than before mass immigration began4

+169%
Rent Increase Since 1990

Median rent rose from $600 to $1,837 monthly while wages stagnated—demand outpacing supply5


The Second Wave of Mass Immigration

Foreign-born population and annual immigration since 1970. The Immigration Act of 1990 triggered unprecedented growth.

Foreign-Born Population (millions)

60M50M40M30M20M10M0
1990 Act
9.6M
1970
4.7% of U.S. population
14.1M
1980
6.2% of U.S. population
19.8M
1990
7.9% of U.S. population
31.1M
2000
11.1% of U.S. population
40M
2010
12.9% of U.S. population
44.9M
2020
13.7% of U.S. population
51.6M
2025 (Now)
15.6% of U.S. population
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2025 (Now)
Pre-1990
Post-1990

Annual Immigration Flow

3M2M1M0
370K
50K
520K
100K
600K
300K
840K
500K
1.04M
400K
1.1M
1.8M
1.2M
2M
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2025 (Now)
Legal Entries
Illegal Entries
+31.8 Million

Foreign-born residents added since the 1990 Immigration Act

~72 Million

Including their U.S.-born children

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; DHS Yearbook; CIS


Mission

Comprehensive immigration reform that restores America's sovereignty and ensures successful integration.

Reduce Immigration

Transition from mass immigration to sustainable levels that enable genuine integration—economic mobility through fair wages and social belonging within American communities.

Prioritize Compatibility

Focus on immigrants who can assimilate successfully, along with those possessing hyper-specialized skills critical to national interests.

Restore Balance

Significantly reduce immigration to tighten labor markets and allow wages to rise naturally—as they did during the mid-20th century when America last prioritized its workers.


Acknowledging Historical Realities

Even culturally compatible immigration creates challenges when numbers are too high.

The First Great Wave (1890-1924)

America experienced unfettered mass immigration primarily from Eastern Europe, including large numbers of Jewish, Italian, Polish, and other Eastern European immigrants. While many shared religious or cultural similarities with the existing American population, the sheer scale created severe problems:

  • Overcrowded tenement housing in major cities
  • Dramatic increases in urban housing costs
  • Poor sanitary conditions and public health crises
  • Strained public services and infrastructure
  • Social tensions and cultural conflicts

What Made It Work

Today, descendants of these immigrants—particularly the Christian immigrants—are well-integrated into American society. But this successful outcome wasn't inevitable. Two critical factors enabled integration:

Immigration Restriction

The Immigration Acts of 1917 and 1924 dramatically reduced immigration levels, giving existing immigrant communities time to integrate without continuous new arrivals overwhelming the assimilation process.

Forced Assimilation

Strong social pressure, English-language requirements, and civic expectations compelled immigrants to adopt American cultural norms, values, and identity rather than maintaining separate ethnic enclaves.

The lesson is clear: even relatively compatible immigration requires controlled numbers and active assimilation to succeed. Without the 1924 restrictions and the assimilation pressure that followed, the integration of early 20th-century immigrants would likely have failed.


The Three Pillars of Assimilation

Understanding successful immigration requires examining three fundamental dimensions that shape integration outcomes

Religion

Shared religious values, traditions, and moral frameworks create common ground for social cohesion and mutual understanding.

The United States is historically and culturally a Christian country, with a Catholic influence that dates back to the 1800s.

Ethnicity

Common ethnic backgrounds, ancestral heritage, and genetic similarity facilitate natural cultural transmission across generations.

Europeans serve as the bedrock of American identity, with Hispanics representing a large and influential immigrant group.

Culture

The most complex pillar.

Language, social norms, family structures, and civic values shape daily life and long-term integration.

Successful immigrants fill jobs, build businesses, and assimilate into the general population seamlessly—adapting to American culture rather than requiring America to change for them.

Why This Matters

Countries with the most successful immigration outcomes tend to receive immigrants who score highly across all three pillars. When there is significant alignment in religion, ethnicity, and culture, integration happens naturally across generations.

Conversely, large gaps in any pillar—especially culture—create persistent integration challenges that can span multiple generations, affecting social cohesion, economic outcomes, and national identity.


Explore Our Research

Read our in-depth articles and analysis on immigration policy, cultural integration, and comparative international perspectives.

Read Our Articles

Sources