Policy Analysis

The H-1B Visa: How a Program for 'Exceptional Talent' Became a Tool for Cheap Labor

Created in 1990 to attract the world's best minds to America, the H-1B visa program has been transformed into something its creators never intended: a pipeline for below-median-wage workers that displaces American graduates and undermines the tech industry.

By Research Team

The H-1B Visa: How a Program for 'Exceptional Talent' Became a Tool for Cheap Labor
The H-1B Visa: How a Program for 'Exceptional Talent' Became a Tool for Cheap Labor Source: Unsplash

Key Findings

  • 1.72% of H-1B visas go to Indian nationals, mostly in IT services - not the 'best and brightest' the program promised.
  • 2.The median H-1B wage is below the median US tech salary. Companies use the program to hire cheaper, not better.
  • 3.Major companies have laid off qualified American workers while simultaneously hiring thousands of cheaper H-1B replacements.
  • 4.No other developed country runs a guest worker program at this scale. The H-1B is an American anomaly.

The H-1B visa was created with a simple promise: bring the world's most exceptional talent to America to fill jobs that no American could fill. Thirty-five years later, the program has become something very different-a mechanism for tech companies to hire foreign workers at below-market wages while American STEM graduates struggle to find work.

The numbers tell a damning story of a program that has lost its way.

H-1B Visa Program: By the Numbers

Where H-1B workers come from and what they're paid (FY 2023-2024)

Country of Birth (FY 2024)

India72%
287K
China12%
47K
Canada3%
South Korea1.3%
Philippines1.6%
Other10.1%
42K

Source: USCIS FY2023-2024 Reports; Pew Research Center

Wage Level Distribution (FY 2019)

Level 1 (17th %ile)14%
Entry-level wages
Level 2 (34th %ile)46%
Below median wages
Level 3 (50th %ile)19%
Median wages
Level 4 (67th %ile)12%
Experienced wages
Other/Survey9%
Alternative surveys

60% of H-1B positions pay below median wages

Levels 1 & 2 combined = below-median local wages

Source: EPI analysis of DOL LCA data, FY2019

400K
Approved in 2024
72%
From India
65K
Annual Cap
65%
Are Renewals

H-1B Visa Approvals Over Time

Total approvals (new + renewals) have grown far beyond the original cap

1991-98: 65K
1999-00: 115K
2001-03: 195K
2004+: 85K*
500K400K300K200K100K0
85K cap
1992
49K approved
Cap: 65K
1995
54K approved
Cap: 65K
1998
65K approved
Cap: 65K
1999
115K approved
Cap: 115K
2000
137K approved
Cap: 115K
2001
164K approved
Cap: 195K
2002
104K approved
Cap: 195K
2003
108K approved
Cap: 195K
2004
130K approved
Cap: 65K
2008
276K approved
Cap: 85K
2012
262K approved
Cap: 85K
2016
345K approved
Cap: 85K
2020
407K approved
Cap: 85K
2022
442K approved
Cap: 85K
2024
399K approved
Cap: 85K
92
95
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
08
12
16
20
22
24
Total Approvals
Current Cap (85K)
399,000 Approved in 2024

More than 4.7x the statutory cap of 85,000 - 65% were renewals

*Cap = 65,000 + 20,000 for U.S. advanced degree holders. Total approvals include renewals and cap-exempt positions.

Sources: USCIS; Pew Research

The Original Promise: "Specialty Occupations" and Exceptional Skills

When President George H.W. Bush signed the Immigration Act of 1990, the H-1B visa was designed for a narrow purpose: bringing in workers with truly exceptional skills that Americans lacked.

The law defined "specialty occupation" as requiring:

  • Theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge
  • At minimum, a bachelor's degree in the specific specialty

The intent was clear: H-1B workers would fill genuine skill gaps at the top of the labor market. Congress set the annual cap at 65,000 visas, believing this would be sufficient for truly exceptional cases.

What the Architects Envisioned

The 1990 compromise between labor unions and employers included safeguards:

  • A wage floor to prevent undercutting American workers
  • An annual cap to limit the program's scope
  • Specialty requirements to ensure only highly skilled workers qualified

The expectation was that H-1B workers would be paid *above* market wages-not below-because they possessed skills no American had.

The Reality: Below-Median Wages and Entry-Level Jobs

Three decades later, the data reveals a stark departure from the program's original intent.

60% of H-1B Jobs Pay Below Median Wages

According to the Economic Policy Institute's analysis of Department of Labor data, 60% of all H-1B positions are certified at wage levels below the local median for their occupation:

Wage LevelPercentileShare of H-1B JobsDescription
Level 117th14%Entry-level wages
Level 234th46%Below median
Level 350th19%Median wages
Level 467th12%Experienced

If H-1B workers truly possessed "exceptional" skills that no American had, they would command *premium* wages-not wages at the 17th or 34th percentile. The data proves the opposite: most H-1B workers are paid less than the typical American in their field.

Major Tech Firms: Part of the Problem

This isn't just about outsourcing firms. Major U.S.-based technology companies that hire H-1B workers directly have significant shares of their positions assigned as Level 1 or Level 2-below-median wages.

For the top 30 H-1B employers in FY 2019: - 12% of certified positions were at Level 1 (entry-level) - 48% were at Level 2 (below median) - 60% total were below median local wages

When Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are hiring H-1B workers at below-median wages, it's hard to argue these workers possess skills that command premium compensation.

One Country, One Program

Perhaps the most striking feature of the modern H-1B program is its demographic concentration.

72% From a Single Country

CountryShare of H-1B Approvals (FY 2024)
India72%
China12%
Canada3%
Other13%

Nearly three-quarters of all H-1B approvals go to workers from India. This isn't because India produces the world's only talented workers-it's because a specific pipeline has been created connecting Indian IT firms, U.S. tech companies, and immigration law firms.

This concentration raises a fundamental question: If H-1B visas went to workers with truly unique, irreplaceable skills, wouldn't we see a more diverse distribution across countries? The single-country dominance suggests something else: a systematic pipeline that has little to do with exceptional talent.

The Training Gap Myth

Advocates for H-1B expansion often claim there aren't enough American STEM graduates to fill tech positions. The data says otherwise.

More American STEM Graduates Than STEM Jobs

According to research by Rutgers University Professor Hal Salzman:

  • Only 30-50% of American STEM graduates work in STEM fields
  • The IT industry laid off 97,000 workers per year on average from 2006-2016
  • In that same period, 74,000 H-1B workers were brought in annually for IT positions

A 2012 IEEE study found that after 10 years, only 8% of Americans with undergraduate STEM degrees still work in STEM-related fields.

Meanwhile, American Tech Graduates Face Record Unemployment

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reports that among recent college graduates ages 22-27: - Computer science majors: 6.1% unemployment - Computer engineering majors: 7.5% unemployment

These rates are more than double the unemployment of biology and art history graduates. How can we claim a STEM shortage when computer science graduates can't find jobs?

The Real Issue: Universities Promoting the Wrong Degrees

The problem isn't that Americans don't want STEM careers. It's that our university system has failed to prepare them while simultaneously promoting degrees with limited market value.

Degree TypeMedian Annual WageGender Balance
STEM occupations$101,65072% male
Non-STEM occupations$46,680More balanced
Arts & Humanities$69,000More female

At less selective institutions, the gender ratio in computer science has actually *worsened*-from 3.5 men per woman in 2002 to 7 men per woman in 2022. Instead of encouraging more Americans into high-paying STEM fields, universities have expanded programs in fields with limited job prospects.

The Transformation of Silicon Valley

In 1990, about 30% of Silicon Valley engineers were foreign-born. By 2023, that figure had jumped to 66%-two-thirds of the tech workforce.

The 2025 Silicon Valley Index reported that two-thirds of tech sector employees are foreign-born, with 70% of those holding bachelor's degrees or higher being immigrants. Of tech workers with a bachelor's degree or higher, 23% came from India and 18% from China-while only 17% were born in California.

This wasn't a natural evolution. It was a policy choice-enabled by the H-1B program-that transformed American tech from a domestic industry to one dependent on foreign labor.

Between 2020-2024, Amazon alone received over 56,000 H-1B approvals. Meta accounts for 40% of all H-1B approvals in the Information sector since 2020.

How the Program Actually Works

Understanding how H-1B has been corrupted requires looking at the mechanics:

1. The Lottery System Favors Volume Over Quality

With 780,884 registrations for just 85,000 cap-subject slots in FY 2024, companies that submit more applications have better odds. This rewards large employers who sponsor hundreds or thousands of workers, not individual exceptional candidates.

2. Wage Rules Are Easily Gamed

The "prevailing wage" system has four levels, and employers choose which level to assign. By designating positions at Level 1 or Level 2, companies can legally pay H-1B workers 17-34% below the median wage for their occupation.

3. Renewals Dwarf New Hires

In 2024, 65% of approved H-1B applications were renewals-not new talent entering the country. The program has become a mechanism for maintaining an existing foreign workforce rather than filling new skill gaps.

4. Universities Are Exempt from Caps

Universities and nonprofits aren't subject to the 65,000 annual cap, creating a separate pipeline that trains foreign students who then seek H-1B sponsorship in the private sector.

The Impact on American Workers

The consequences of H-1B expansion are felt directly by American workers:

Displaced by Visa Workers

Reports indicate that many American tech companies have laid off their qualified and highly skilled American workers and simultaneously hired thousands of H-1B workers. One software company was approved for over 5,000 H-1B workers in FY 2025 while announcing more than 15,000 layoffs around the same time.

Wage Suppression

When 60% of H-1B workers are paid below-median wages, it creates downward pressure on compensation for all workers in those fields. American workers must compete against a labor pool willing to accept lower wages.

Reduced Training Investment

Why invest in training American workers when you can hire cheaper foreign workers already trained? The H-1B program reduces employers' incentives to develop domestic talent.

The Competition Fallacy

Defenders of H-1B expansion often invoke competition: "American workers need to compete in a global economy." But this argument fundamentally misunderstands what labor policy is supposed to do.

Competition Should Be Domestic

Competition is healthy-when it's fair. American workers competing against each other for jobs, pushing each other to develop skills and work harder, benefits everyone. This is how a healthy labor market functions.

But the H-1B program doesn't create fair competition. It pits 330 million Americans against the labor pools of countries with populations 3-4 times larger:

CountryPopulationWorking-Age Adults
United States330 million~200 million
India1.4 billion~900 million
China1.4 billion~980 million

When you open American jobs to competition from countries with nearly a billion working-age adults each, you're not creating a level playing field-you're flooding the market.

The Purpose of Immigration Policy

Immigration policy exists to serve the national interest-not to provide global corporations with access to the cheapest possible labor. The question isn't "Can we find someone somewhere in the world willing to do this job for less?" The question should be: "What policies benefit American workers and American families?"

No other country operates this way. India doesn't open its labor market to American workers. China doesn't let foreign workers displace its citizens. Only America has convinced itself that protecting its own workers is somehow wrong.

The Math Doesn't Work

Even if only 1% of India's working-age population wanted American tech jobs, that's 9 million people-more than the entire U.S. tech workforce. No amount of "competition" from American workers can offset that kind of numerical disparity.

The H-1B program wasn't designed to make American workers compete against the world. It was designed to fill genuine skill gaps with exceptional talent. The moment it became a tool for mass labor arbitrage, it stopped serving American interests.

What Real Reform Would Look Like

The solution isn't to eliminate skilled immigration-it's to return the H-1B program to its original purpose:

1. Require Above-Median Wages

If a worker truly possesses skills no American has, the market would pay above-median wages. Eliminate Level 1 and Level 2 wage designations for H-1B workers. Require employers to pay at least the 67th percentile (Level 4) for all H-1B positions.

2. Prioritize by Wage Level

Instead of a lottery, allocate visas to the highest-paying positions first. This ensures visas go to genuinely exceptional talent, not cheaper labor.

3. End the Renewal Pipeline

Cap the total years a worker can remain on H-1B status. The visa was designed as "temporary"-enforce that.

4. Require American Recruitment First

Before sponsoring an H-1B worker, require employers to demonstrate good-faith efforts to hire American workers at comparable wages.

5. Eliminate Volume Advantages

Limit the number of H-1B applications per employer to prevent large companies from gaming the lottery system.

The Path Forward

The H-1B program has strayed far from its original mission. What was designed to bring exceptional talent to America has become a tool for wage suppression and the displacement of American workers.

The evidence is clear:

  • 60% of H-1B jobs pay below median wages
  • 72% of visas go to workers from a single country
  • American STEM graduates face higher unemployment than art history majors
  • Silicon Valley went from 30% to 66% foreign-born in 33 years

These aren't signs of a program attracting the world's best and brightest. They're signs of a program that has been captured by employer interests and transformed into a cheap labor pipeline.

America should welcome truly exceptional talent. But we should also protect American workers from a system designed to undercut their wages and replace them with cheaper alternatives.

The choice is clear: reform the H-1B program to fulfill its original promise, or continue watching American workers be displaced by a system that serves employer profits over national interest.


Sources

Program Statistics

Wage Level Analysis

Employment Data

Historical Context

Silicon Valley Demographics

Employer Data

Academic Research

  • Salzman, Hal. Congressional Testimony on H-1B Impact - Senate Judiciary Committee testimony on STEM labor market dynamics

Image Credit