Economic Analysis

The Wage Stagnation Crisis: How Mass Immigration Broke the American Dream

For 45 years, real wages for American workers have barely moved. The cause is simple economics: when you flood the labor market with tens of millions of workers, wages fall. Here's the data they don't want you to see.

By Research Team

The Wage Stagnation Crisis: How Mass Immigration Broke the American Dream
The Wage Stagnation Crisis: How Mass Immigration Broke the American Dream Source: Unsplash

Key Findings

  • 1.Real wages for American workers have been flat since 1973 - 50 years of stagnation despite massive productivity gains.
  • 2.The foreign-born labor force nearly tripled from 11M to 30M since 1990. That's 19 million more workers competing for jobs.
  • 3.After the 1924 restriction, wages rose for 40 straight years and the middle class expanded to its peak.
  • 4.Harvard economist George Borjas found that immigration redistributes income - lowering wages for competing Americans, especially those without a high school diploma.

In 1973, the average American worker's hourly wage had the purchasing power of $23.68 in today's dollars. In 2024, it's essentially the same. Half a century of technological progress, productivity gains, and economic growth - and workers are no better off than their grandparents.

This isn't a mystery. It's basic economics. When you dramatically increase the supply of labor, you suppress wages. And since 1990, America has added over 30 million foreign-born workers to the labor market.

The Numbers Tell the Story

Real Wage Stagnation: 1973-2024

PeriodReal Hourly Wage (2024 dollars)Change
1973 (Peak)$23.68-
1995$21.00-11%
2024$23.90+1%

After adjusting for inflation, the average American worker earns essentially the same hourly wage as in 1973. More than 50 years of stagnation.

Median Household Income Growth Has Collapsed

PeriodAnnual Income Growth Rate
1970-20001.2% per year
2000-20180.3% per year

Income growth slowed by 75% after 2000. If incomes had continued growing at the 1970-2000 rate, the median household would earn $87,000 today instead of $74,600.

Labor's Share of GDP Has Fallen

YearWages as % of GDP
197051%
201343%
Change-8 percentage points

Workers are getting a smaller slice of a bigger pie. The gains from economic growth are going to capital owners - and to cheaper labor.

The Immigration Connection

Harvard economist George Borjas - described as "America's leading immigration economist" - has documented the wage impact of immigration for decades.

Key Findings from Borjas Research

Immigration redistributes income. Economic theory predicts that immigration will redistribute income by:

  • Lowering wages of competing American workers
  • Increasing wages of complementary workers
  • Increasing profits for businesses using immigrant labor

The hardest hit are the poorest Americans. Immigration has its largest negative impact on workers without a high school diploma - the poorest Americans who can least afford wage competition.

Native workers flee, spreading the impact. When immigration lowers wages in one city, native workers move elsewhere. This spreads the wage suppression nationwide - you can't escape it by relocating.

The Mariel Boatlift: A Natural Experiment

In 1980, 125,000 Cuban refugees arrived in Miami in just six months, increasing Miami's labor force by 7%. Borjas studied what happened to low-skill native workers:

MetricFinding
Wage drop for low-skill nativesLargest in any U.S. city
Recovery time10 years (by 1990)
Workers affectedNon-Hispanic men without high school diploma

The wage drop experienced by Miami's low-skill workers was the largest seen in any local labor market in the United States.

The Foreign-Born Labor Force Explosion

Share of U.S. Labor Force That Is Foreign-Born

YearForeign-Born ShareNumber
1970~5%~4 million
19909.3%11 million
200013.3%17 million
201015.8%24 million
202318.6%30 million
202419.2%31.4 million

The foreign-born share of the labor force has nearly quadrupled since 1970. In 2024 alone, 31.4 million foreign-born individuals were in the U.S. labor force - one in five workers.

Native-Born Workers Are Dropping Out

Here's a statistic that should alarm everyone: the labor force participation rate of American-born men without a college degree has collapsed.

Labor Force Participation: U.S.-Born Men Without Bachelor's (Ages 18-64)

YearParticipation Rate
1960s>90%
200082.6%
200680.5%
201976.3%
2024Still below 2019

More than 90% of working-age American men without college degrees were in the labor force in the 1960s. Today, it's around 76%. Where did they go?

They dropped out. Immigration - along with globalization, weaker unions, and a stagnant minimum wage - suppressed wages and made it harder for these men to find jobs. Many simply gave up.

The 2024-2025 Data: Real-Time Evidence

Recent Federal Reserve research confirms what Borjas documented decades ago.

Immigration Cools Wage Growth

A 2024 Kansas City Fed study found that the influx of immigrant workers dampened wage pressures across affected industries:

FindingData
Wage impact-0.7 percentage points wage growth
Per every1.0 percentage point increase in immigrant employment
Most affected industriesConstruction, manufacturing

Industries with the highest immigrant workforce growth saw the sharpest deceleration in wage growth.

Construction: A Case Study

MetricValue
Share of construction workers who are immigrants34%
Share of drywall/plasterers who are immigrants~60%
Construction wage growth (July 2025)8% (vs. 4% national average)

When immigration enforcement increased in 2025, construction wages surged to nearly double the national average. The cause and effect is undeniable.

2025: What Happens When Immigration Slows

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged in 2025 that immigration policy was slowing labor supply:

> "Because of immigration policy really, the flow into our labor forces is just a great deal slower."

The result? Low-wage workers - who were supposed to benefit from reduced competition - saw their wage growth decline from 3.9% to 1.5% in 2025. But this reflects a broader economic slowdown, not the labor market effects of immigration reduction, which take years to materialize.

Who Benefits? Who Loses?

Immigration isn't bad for everyone. It's a transfer of wealth.

Winners from Mass Immigration

BeneficiaryHow They Gain
Business ownersLower labor costs, higher profits
High-skill professionalsCheaper services (nannies, restaurants, landscaping)
Upper-income householdsMaintained standard of living
Immigrants themselvesHigher wages than home country

Losers from Mass Immigration

GroupHow They're Harmed
Workers without college degreesDirect wage competition
Young workers entering job marketFewer entry-level opportunities
Black AmericansHistorically faced strongest competition
Working-class communitiesDeclining wages, disappearing jobs

The middle class has shrunk from 61% of adults in 1971 to just 50% in 2021. Meanwhile, upper-income households increased their share of aggregate income from 29% in 1970 to 50% in 2020.

Immigration accelerated this inequality.

The Pre-1990 Economy

What did America look like before mass immigration?

The 1950s-1980s Labor Market

MetricThenNow
Foreign-born share of labor force~5%19%
Single income could support familyYesRarely
Manufacturing jobsAbundantScarce
Union membership~30%~10%
College required for middle classNoOften

The restrictive immigration policies from 1924-1965 created a tight labor market. Workers had bargaining power. Wages rose with productivity. A high school graduate could support a family.

The Solution

The economics are clear. To restore American wages:

1. Reduce immigration to pre-1990 levels Cut legal immigration from over 1 million to approximately 250,000 annually - the level maintained during America's greatest period of wage growth.

2. Enforce immigration law End illegal immigration, which adds 2-3 million annual competitors for working-class jobs.

3. Prioritize American workers End programs like H-1B that allow companies to hire foreign workers at below-market wages.

4. Allow the labor market to tighten With reduced immigration, employers will have to compete for workers by raising wages - exactly what happened in construction in 2025.

The Bottom Line

For 50 years, real wages have stagnated while corporate profits soared. This isn't a coincidence. It's the predictable result of flooding the labor market with tens of millions of additional workers.

The data is clear:

  • Real wages peaked in 1973 - before mass immigration
  • Wage growth collapsed after the 1990 Immigration Act
  • Industries with more immigrants have lower wage growth
  • Native workers are dropping out of the labor force

American workers deserve a labor market that works for them. That requires immigration levels that are sustainable - not the highest in history.


Sources

Wage and Income Data

Immigration Economics Research

Labor Force Statistics

Federal Reserve Research

Image Credit