The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Barbara on June 30, 2026 that children born on American soil are American citizens, regardless of if their parents are in the country illegally or on temporary visas. This struck down Executive Order 14160, which President Trump signed on his first day of office in January 2025. The ruling reaffirmed United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the 1898 decision that had governed this debate for 128 years.[1]
An Old Rule and Illegal Immigration
The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in July 1868 to secure citizenship for freed slaves. Congress wrote it for the specific reason of overturning Dred Scott v. Sandford, the 1857 decision that had held Black Americans could not be citizens,
At that time, the concept of mass illegal immigration was unfathomable.[17] In fact, for the vast majority of the country's history, illegal immigration has been a non-issue. It was only in the 1970s that it started increasing, after the Bracero guest-worker program ended in 1964 and the 1965 Act placed the first numerical ceiling on immigration from the Western Hemisphere.[6][7] Since then, it's progressively become a bigger issue, and a core focus for conservatives since the late 2010s.
Illegal-immigrant population of the United States, 1980-2023
The rule is old. The population it applies to is not.
The clause was ratified in 1868, construed in Wong Kim Ark in 1898, and the first numerical quotas came in 1921. The population it now reaches is a later development entirely: from 2.06 million in 1980 to roughly 14 million in 2023.
Federal estimates put 2.06 million illegal immigrants in the country in 1980 and 3.2 million in 1986, the year Congress legalized roughly 2.7 million of them and knocked the total down to 1.9 million by 1988.[7] It reached 8.6 million by 2000, peaked at 12.2 million in 2007, and stood near 14 million in 2023.[8]
Births followed the same curve. About 380,000 children were born to illegal-immigrant mothers in 2006. The number fell more than 40% to 215,000 by 2019, then climbed to 300,000 by 2023. Counting mothers on temporary status adds another 20,000, for roughly 320,000 births, about 9% of the 3.6 million children born in the United States that year.[9]
Births to illegal-immigrant mothers, 1990-2023
Up 150%, then down 43%, then up again
120,000 in 1990, a peak of 380,000 in 2006, 215,000 by 2019, and 300,000 in 2023. Adding mothers on temporary status brings 2023 to 320,000, about 9% of all U.S. births.
Pew estimates that about 260,000 of those 320,000 children would not have been citizens under Executive Order 14160, which required at least one parent to be a citizen or a lawful permanent resident.[9]
Why a new law would fail
Three bills in Congress would restrict birthright citizenship by ordinary legislation. The Birthright Citizenship Act, from Representative Brian Babin and Senator Lindsey Graham, and Senator Tom Cotton's Constitutional Citizenship Clarification Act were both introduced in 2025. Representative John McGuire introduced the Birthright Citizenship Clarification Act on July 9, 2026, nine days after the ruling, which would write the voided executive order into federal law.[3]
All three rest on the same theory: that Congress can define who counts as "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. Five justices have now said the Fourteenth Amendment answers that question on its own. In City of Boerne v. Flores the Court held that Congress's power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment is the power to enforce it as the Court has read it, not to rewrite it.[4] A statute resting on that theory would be reviewed against the same reading of the Amendment that voided the executive order.
Kavanaugh's concurrence is the one opening, and it is narrow. He did not write that Congress may narrow the Citizenship Clause; he wrote that Congress might add exceptions alongside the established ones for the children of diplomats and of hostile occupying forces, and he wrote alone. A statute built on that reasoning would need four more votes than it currently has.
What can be done
The ruling settled who is born a citizen and left ordinary immigration law untouched. Two provisions of that law decide what a citizen child is worth to a parent years later, and Congress can amend both.
1. The Green Card a citizen child can get for a parent
A citizen child who turns 21 may petition for a parent to receive a Green Card, and that petition is not subject to any annual cap.[10] The category is measured: DHS granted 252,570 Green Cards to parents of U.S. citizens in 2024, 18.5% of every Green Card issued that year, against 140,130 in 2019 and a low of 80,520 in 2021.[16] What happens next depends on how the parent entered.
- A parent who arrived on a visa and overstayed is treated as an immediate relative. That parent is exempt from the usual penalties for overstaying or working without permission and can obtain a Green Card without ever leaving the country.[11] Overstays are about 42% of the illegal population.[15]
- A parent who crossed the border without inspection cannot get a Green Card from inside the country and must leave to apply, which triggers a ten-year bar on returning. The waiver for that bar requires proving hardship to a citizen spouse or parent, and federal regulation does not count a citizen child as a qualifying relative.[12]
Green Cards to parents of U.S. citizens
252,570 in 2024, nearly one Green Card in five
The category runs uncapped. It sat near 140,000 a year through the late 2010s, fell to 80,520 in 2021, and has since risen to a record.
Only the first route works in practice, and Congress can close it by taking parents out of the immediate-relative category. The common claim that a citizen child can sponsor any parent at 21 fails for everyone who crossed the border illegally.
2. Birth tourism
The Center for Immigration Studies estimates more than 33,000 children a year are born to foreign nationals who travel here specifically to give birth.[13] Senator Marsha Blackburn's Ban Birth Tourism Act, introduced May 20, 2025 and referred to the Judiciary Committee, would make travel for that purpose a ground for denying a visa.[14] Consular officers can already refuse a visitor visa when they determine the applicant's primary purpose is giving birth on American soil, and those refusals are generally beyond judicial review.
Recommendations
The ruling put the child's citizenship beyond the reach of Congress. The Green Card a parent can collect years later is ordinary immigration law, and Congress can change it.
- Take parents out of the immediate-relative category. Immigration law puts the parent of an adult citizen in the same category as a spouse or a minor child. That category does two things: it exempts the person from the annual Green Card caps, and it lets them apply from inside the United States even after overstaying a visa. Anyone else who overstays by more than a year has to leave to apply, and then cannot return for ten years.[11] Congress can drop parents from the category and keep spouses and minor children in it. A parent who overstayed would then have to leave like everyone else. The child stays a citizen either way.
- Enact the Ban Birth Tourism Act (S. 1812). Make travel undertaken primarily to give birth in the United States a ground for visa refusal, and fund the consular training and enforcement to apply it against the estimated 33,000 birth-tourism births a year.[14]
- Require DHS to publish the two splits it withholds. The total is already public: 252,570 Green Cards went to parents of U.S. citizens in 2024.[16] What DHS does not publish is how the sponsoring citizen acquired citizenship, or how the parent first entered the country. Those two breakdowns separate the parents of birthright citizens from the parents of naturalized citizens, and the visa overstayers from those who crossed illegally, which is the difference between a pathway Congress can close and one it cannot.
Sources
- Trump v. Barbara, No. 25-365 (June 30, 2026) - Opinion of the Court, concurrence, and dissents
- Executive Order 14160, "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," January 20, 2025
- Constitutional Citizenship Clarification Act of 2025, S. 2274, 119th Congress
- City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) - Limits on Congress's power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) - The 1898 decision establishing citizenship by birth on U.S. soil
- Migration Policy Institute, "A Century Later, Restrictive 1924 U.S. Immigration Law Has Reverberations in Immigration Debate" - Absence of numerical limits before 1921; the 1924 Act and the creation of the Border Patrol
- Congressional Research Service, RL33874, "Unauthorized Aliens Residing in the United States: Estimates Since 1986"
- Pew Research Center, "U.S. Unauthorized Immigrant Population Reached a Record 14 Million in 2023" (August 21, 2025) - 1990-2023 population series and the 2007 peak
- Pew Research Center, "About 9% of U.S. births in 2023 were to unauthorized or temporary legal immigrant mothers" (March 31, 2026)
- 8 U.S.C. § 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), immediate relatives exempt from numerical limits
- USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 7, Part B, Chapter 4: Status and Nonimmigrant Visa Violations - Immediate-relative exemptions from the bars to adjustment of status
- 8 CFR § 212.7(e)(4), provisional unlawful presence waiver: qualifying relative - Qualifying relative limited to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse or parent
- Center for Immigration Studies, "Births to Illegal Immigrants and Long-Term Temporary Visitors"
- Ban Birth Tourism Act, S. 1812, 119th Congress
- Center for Migration Studies, "The 2,000 Mile Wall in Search of a Purpose" - visa overstays as 42% of the illegal population
- DHS Office of Homeland Security Statistics, Yearbook of Immigration Statistics 2024, Table 6 - Green Cards by class of admission; the "Parents" line inside immediate relatives of U.S. citizens: 132,960 (2015), 140,130 (2019), 80,520 (2021), 208,350 (2023), 252,570 (2024)
- Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) - the holding the Citizenship Clause was written to overturn
